Scientific Program 

Wednesday, September 11, 2024

12:00-13:00 Pre-Congress Industry Symposium
Click HERE for more information
Hall A

 

11:30-13:00 Pre-Congress Symposium:
AI in breast imaging
Hall B
Chairpersons
11:30-11:45 Hype or hope: Breast imaging and Artificial Intelligence
Gerald Lip,
Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
11:45-12:00 Optimizing breast MRI utility with AI 
Karla Sepulveda,
Houston, TX, USA
12:00-13:00 Round Table Discussion:
James Blackwood, Glenboig, Scotland, UK
Julia Camps Herrero, Valencia, Spain

 

13:00-13:15 Congress Opening Hall A
Chairpersons Leena Chagla, Cheshire, UK
Bruce Mann, Melbourne, Australia
Welcome from Congress chairpersons

 

13:15-14:45 Session 1: Neoadjuvant therapy Hall A
Chairpersons Leena Chagla, Cheshire, UK
Bruce Mann, Melbourne, Australia
13:15-13:50
13:15
13:25
13:35
Debate: That cT1cN0 HER2+ve should have NAST
Yes: Javier Cortes, Madrid, Spain
No: Sarah Downey, Norfolk, UK 
Discussion
13:50-14:05 Imaging during NAST
Julia Camps Herrero, Valencia, Spain
14:05-14:45
14:05
14:15
14:25
Debate: Patients with a positive TAD post NACT should have completion axillary clearance  
Yes: Stephen Grobmyer, Abu Dhabi, UAE
No: Amit Goyal, Derby, UK
Discussion

 

14:40-15:10 Coffee break, poster viewing and exhibition visit

 

15:10-16:10 Session 2: Imaging Hall A
Chairpersons Nisha Sharma, Leeds, UK
Karla Sepulveda, Houston, TX, USA
15:10-15:40
15:10
15:20
15:30
Debate: The Contrast Breast Imaging should be routine prior to surgery for DCIS or invasive cancer 
Yes: Bruce Mann, Melbourne, Australia
No: Stuart McIntosh, Belfast, UK 
Discussion
15:40-16:10
15:40
15:50
16:00
Debate: The CEM should be the surveillance imaging test for most patient with past history of breast cancer 
Yes: Allison Rose, Melbourne, Australia
No: Sarah Savaridas, Dundee, Scotland, UK
Discussion

 

15:10-16:10 Session 3: HER2+ve disease Hall B
Chairpersons Richard de Boer, Melbourne, Australia
Olga Oikonomidou, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
15:10-15:40
15:10
15:20
15:30
Debate: Do anthracyclines still have a place in the treatment of early stage HER2+ve BC?
Yes: Richard Simcock, Surrey, UK
No: Kevin Kalinsky, Atlanta, GA, USA
Discussion
15:40-15:55 HER2 low
Sarah Pinder, London, UK
15:55-16:10 Is there a threshold for systemic treatment of HER2+ve cancer?
Iain MacPherson, Glasgow, Scotland, UK

 

16:10-17:10 Session 4: DCIS Hall A
Chairpersons Bruce Mann, Melbourne, Australia
Tracey Irvine,
Surrey, UK 
16:10-16:40
16:10
16:20
16:30
Debate: That most patients with DCIS should have radiotherapy after Breast Conserving Surgery
Yes: Frank A. Vicini, Farmington Hillis, MI, USA
No: Elinor Sawyer, London, UK
Discussion
16:40-17:10
16:40
16:50
17:00
Debate: That active surveillance for low risk DCIS is a reasonable option
Yes: Shelley Potter, Bristol, UK
No: Henry J. Cain, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Discussion

 

 16:10-17:10 Session 5: Metastatic HR+ve breast cancer
Hall B
Chairpersons Richard de Boer, Melbourne, Australia
Olga Oikonomidou, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
16:10-16:40 What to do after progression on CDKi
Kevin Kalinsky, Atlanta, GA, USA
16:40-17:10
16:40
16:50
17:00
Debate: That CDKi should be first line treatment for ~all HR+ve MBC 
Yes: Javier Cortes, Madrid, Spain
No: Mark Verrill, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Discussion

 

17:15-18:15 Networking Reception

 

Thursday, September 12, 2024

 07:30-08:30 Industry Breakfast Symposium
Click HERE for more information
Hall A
Light refreshments will be served prior to the session

 

07:30-08:30 Industry Breakfast Symposium
Click HERE for more information
Hall B
Light refreshments will be served prior to the session

 

 08:30-09:30 Session 6: Breast cancer in young women Hall A
Chairpersons Ramsey Cutress, Southampton, UK
Yazan Masannat,
 Essex, UK
08:30-09:00 Controversies in breast cancer management in young women
Ann Partridge, Boston, MA, USA
09:00-09:30
09:00
09:10
09:20
Debate: That women <35 with breast cancer should be advised to have bilateral total mastectomy
Yes: Michael Alvarado, San Francisco, CA, USA
No: J. Michael Dixon, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
Discussion

 

09:30-11:00 Session 7: Screening Hall A
Chairpersons Sarah Downey, Norfolk, UK
Laszlo Romics, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
09:30-10:00
09:30
09:40
09:50
Debate: That a change to risk-adjusted screening is urgent and feasible
Yes: D. Gareth Evans, Manchester, UK
No: Cliona Kirwan, Manchester, UK
Discussion
10:00-10:25 CBI in screening
Allison Rose, Melbourne, Australia
10:25-11:00
10:25
10:35
10:45
Debate: That women at low risk for breast cancer should only be screened every 5 years
Yes: Nisha Sharma, Leeds, UK
No: Karla Sepulveda, Houston, TX, USA
Discussion

 

09:30-11:00 Session 8: Triple negative breast cancer Hall B
Chairpersons Richard de Boer, Melbourne, Australia
Richard Simcock, Surrey, UK
09:30-10:00
09:30
09:45
10:00
Debate: That all stage 2/3 TNBC patients should be treated according to Keynote522 regimen
Yes: Olga Oikonomidou, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
No: Carlo Palmieri, Liverpool, UK
Discussion
10:10-10:25 TNBC subtypes: Do they have clinical significance?
Matthew J. Ellis, Houston, TX, USA
10:25-11:00
10:25
10:35
10:45
Debate: Asymptomatic patients with high-risk TNBC should undergo surveillance imaging
Yes: Ann Partridge, Boston, MA, USA
No: Alistair Ring, London, UK
Discussion

 

11:00-11:30 Coffee break, poster viewing and exhibition visit

 

11:30-12:30 Session 9: Metastatic Breast Cancer Hall A
Chairpersons Olga Oikonomidou, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
Iain MacPherson, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
11:30-12:00
11:30
11:40
11:50
Debate: That molecular testing of tumours should be routine for patients with metastatic breast cancer 
Yes: Marina Parton, London, UK
No: Richard de Boer, Melbourne, Australia
Discussion
12:00-12:30
12:00
12:10
12:20
Debate: SABR should be considered in most patients with oligometastatic breast cancer    
Yes: John Conibear, London, UK
No: Stephen Harrow, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
Discussion

 

11:30-12:30 Session 10: Free Papers Hall B
Chairpersons Lynda Wyld, Sheffield, UK
Raghavan Vidya, Birmingham, UK
11:30-11:40 Variation in practice and provision of contralateral symmetrising mastectomy after unilateral mastectomy for breast cancer: A UK national practice survey
Katherine Fairhurst, Bristol, UK
11:40-11:50 Mammographic surveillance in early breast cancer patients aged 50 years or over: Results of the Mammo-50 non-inferiority trial of annual versus less frequent mammography
Janet Dunn, Coventry, UK
11:50-12:00
Oncoplastic breast conservation surgery increases survival in comparison to mastectomy in a west of Scotland population-based study with long-term follow-up
Mhairi Mactier, Clydebank, Scotland, UK
12:00-12:10
Uptake of breast cancer screening with mammography and ultrasound in China: A multi-centre population-based study
Yadi Zheng, China
12:10-12:20 Cumulative risk of cosmetic worsening following ultra-hypofractionated whole breast radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost: Largest real-world data
Tabassum Wadasadawala, Mumbai, India
12:20-12:30 Factors influencing immediate reconstruction and complications for gene carriers in those undergoing mastectomy in KConFAb population
Anita Skandarajah, Melbourne, Australia

 

 12:30-13:30 Pre-Lunch Industry Symposium
Click HERE for more information
Hall A

 

12:30-13:30 Pre-Lunch Industry Symposium
Click HERE for more information
Hall B

 

13:30-14:30 Lunch break, poster viewing and exhibition visit

 

14:30-15:30 Session 11: Genetics Hall A
Chairpersons Alastair Thompson, Houston, TX, USA
Douglas Ferguson,
Exeter, UK
14:30-15:00
14:30
14:40
14:50
Debate: That most cancer patients with gene mutations should be offered breast conservation  
Yes: D. Gareth Evans, Manchester, UK
No: Stuart McIntosh, Belfast, UK 
Discussion
15:00-15:15  The ‘new genes’: What do they mean for patients and families?
Jennie Murray, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK  
15:15-15:30  What is the appropriate timing of risk reduction BSO in BRCA patients?
Cameron Martin, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK

 

14:30-15:30 Session 12: Free Papers Hall B
Chairpersons
14:30-14:40 Verification of the BCAL diagnostics novel lipidomics-based liquid biopsy test BREASTEST for the detection of early-stage breast cancer in an Australian population
David Speakman, Melbourne, Australia
14:40-14:50 Pathological complete response rate in neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus concurrent chemo-endocrine therapy in hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative breast cancer
Shalaka Joshi, Mumbai, India
14:50-15:00
Why have health technology assessment boards reached differing conclusions about the ability of tumour gene expression tests to predict chemotherapy benefit for postmenopausal breast cancer patients?
Robert Stein, London, UK
15:00-15:10
A morphometric signature for HER2 activity predicts recurrence risk in breast cancer
Nehal Atallah, Nottingham, UK
15:10-15:20 Something old, new or borrowed: Optimum second line therapy after CDK4-6 inhibition
Andrew Redfern, Murdoch, Australia
15:20-15:30 Identifying oestrogen receptor-related genes of predictive value in breast cancer
Shorouk Makhlouf, Nottingham, UK

 

15:30-16:00 Coffee break, poster viewing and exhibition visit

 

16:00-17:30 Session 13: Adjuvant endocrine therapy Hall A
Chairpersons Cliona Kirwan, Manchester, UK
John Benson,
Cambridge, UK
16:00-16:45 Why my assay is best
16:00 PAM 50
Matthew J. Ellis, Houston, TX, USA
16:15 ODX
Kevin Kalinsky, Atlanta, GA, USA
16:30
Mammaprint
William Audeh, Los Angeles, CA, USA
16:45-17:30
16:45
17:00
17:15
Debate: That adjuvant CDKs should be recommended for intermediate risk ER+HER2-EBC
Yes: Kevin Kalinsky, Atlanta, GA, USA
No: Alistair Ring, London, UK
Discussion

 

Friday, September 13, 2024

 07:30-08:30 Industry Breakfast Symposium
Click HERE for more information
Hall B
Light refreshments will be served prior to the session

 

08:30-10:00 Session 14: Reconstruction Hall A
Chairpersons Leena Chagla, Cheshire, UK
Krishna Clough, Paris, France
08:30-09:00 Fat grafting, realistic expectations and long-term results
Krishna Clough, Paris, France
09:00-10:00 MDT Round Table Discussion on tricky oncoplastic/reconstructive topics

Case presenters:
Rajiv Dave, Manchester, UK 
Kenneth Elder, Edinburgh, Scotland, UKPanel:
J. Michael Dixon, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
Adam Gilmour, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
Andrew Malyon, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
James Mansell, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
Lynda Wyld, Sheffield, UK

 

08:30-10:00 Session 15: Supportive care Hall B
Chairpersons Olga Oikonomidou, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
Katy Ellis, Manchester, UK
08:30-09:00 TBA
Lesley Fallowfield, Sussex, UK
09:00-09:30 Symptoms of menopause and how to manage them following breast cancer
Paula Briggs, Liverpool, UK
09:30-10:00 TBA
Marina Parton, London, UK

 

10:00-10:30 Coffee break, poster viewing and exhibition visit

 

10:30-11:30 Session 16: Locoregional management Hall A
Chairpersons Krishna Clough, Paris, France
Stephen Grobmyer,
Abu Dhabi, UAE
10:30-11:00
10:30
10:40
10:50
Debate: That patients with heavy axillary nodal disease pre-NACT should have axillary dissection irrespective of response to NACT
Yes: Alastair Thompson, Houston, TX, USA
No: Leena Chagla, Cheshire, UK
Discussion
11:00-11:30
11:00
11:10
11:20
Debate: That all patients with 1-3 macrometastases in axillary nodes should have Regional Nodal Radiation  
Yes: Elinor Sawyer, London, UK 
No: Michael Douek, London, UK
Discussion

 

11:30-12:30 Session 17: Breast Cancer 2035 Hall A
Chairpersons Leena Chagla,Cheshire, UK
Bruce Mann,
Melbourne, Australia
11:30-11:45 Oncoplastic surgery in 2035
Krishna Clough, Paris, France
11:45-12:00 Early detection in 2035
Karla Sepulveda, Houston, TX, USA
12:00-12:15 Management of Stage 1 breast cancer in 2035
Bruce Mann, Melbourne, Australia
12:15-12:30 Systemic therapy in 2035
Olga Oikonomidou, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK

 

 12:30-12:45 Congress closing and Award presentation Hall A
Chairpersons Leena Chagla, Cheshire, UK
Bruce Mann, Melbourne, Australia
  • Program is subject to change
Skip to content